|
|
Sylvia
Marrich Siegel
The headline in the Independent Journal newspaper reads "Consumer
activist Siegel coaxed into
lobbying rerun"! Known
throughout the state as a leading
consumer activist, Sylvia Siegel has come out of retirement at
the request of the
Marin County Board of Supervisors to
investigate consumer
complaints directed at the cable television
industry. Representatives
of the local cable television
station, Viacom, are nervous - with
good reason. The issues at stake in
the cable television
"battle" are high.
It may involve
the re-regulation of the
industry, reinstating strict
guidelines that had been eliminated at the
national level during the
Reagan administration.
Working with Bay
Area government officials, Siegel
is busy educating
herself on both consumer issues and
cable television's counter-issues.
It will be interesting to see what results.
Sylvia
Siegel is no
stranger to
controversy. She
remembers cutting classes
at Detroit
City College
(later Wayne State
University) in order to go and watch the United Auto Worker (UAW) pickets.
Under the leadership of the
Reuther brothers, the UAW was attempting to negotiate fair labor
practices with automobile manufacturers.
It was
not always
a pretty
site, with the automakers' private security guards often attacking the
pickets. Having personally experienced hunger and poverty during the Great
Depression of the 1930s,
Siegel understood the need for people to earn a fair wage, as well as the
need for industry
to follow fair business practices.
Having
scrimped her way through college by
working afternoons at the National Youth Authority, at the local office of the
Campfire Girls, Siegel was able to
gain her first job out of college with the
same organization. Working as
a Campfire
Girl summer counselor, she
remembers earning
$90 for
her work.
Facing another cold Detroit winter, she spent
all her money on a warm
camel's hair
coat with
a fur
collar. She chose the
classy, expensive coat to cover the ragged clothing she
wore underneath. "I
never took my coat off," she claims with a smile.
Finally, in February of 1944, she escaped
the cold
and relocated
to San Francisco.
Moving to San
Francisco was a bold move, for Sylvia "knew nobody, and had no place to
live. I
got a bed to
sleep and spent the next
three months
'pounding the
pavement' to
find a job."
Working for the War Labor Board as
a researcher/analyst, she
found that many of
her co-workers were also
"transplants" from other areas of the country.
They became like a
family, joining each other
for holiday
celebrations and supporting each other through the joys and trials of
daily life.
With
the end of World War II, many people who had war-related employment found
themselves out of work. Sylvia moved
to the California State
Nurses Association
(CSNA), an
advocacy organization for the nursing profession.
Serving as Director of the
Economic Security
Program, it
was a
very demanding and strenuous job. Late
night telephone
calls to
her home, long hours at
the office,
tireless hours
were spent pressing for improvement
of the working conditions
of nurses.
Siegel successfully developed
the collective
bargaining program for
professional nurses. Once,
in a debate with
San Francisco Supervisors over
nurses wages,
Siegel arranged
to have the hearing room
packed with nurses in their white uniforms; she also had three
nurses in wheel chairs attend, underlining the dangers of the nursing
profession. These nurses had
contracted the polio virus while treating
patients. The
event got tremendous media attention.
And Sylvia
Siegel learned
some valuable lessons
regarding advocacy and the media.
Having
married Paul Siegel during this period, the demands of the CSNA work load after
seven years began to
interfere with sleep and time away
from work (there was barely time
for either). So Siegel moved to
a less fatiguing job with the
American Cancer Society (ACS). For
two years, Siegel supervised the activities of the ACS in nine counties
in central
California as
a field representative. The
Siegels moved to Marin during this time. She was with the ACS until the birth of
her first child, Richard, in 1957.
A daughter, Polly, arrived
a year later.
For the next four years, Sylvia stayed
home "sloshing diapers".
Then her neighbor, Helen
Nelson (who
was Governor Pat Brown's Consumer Counsel
for California), encouraged her
to apply
for the Executive Directorship
of the
Association of
California Consumers, a budding consumer
group. Soon,
in 1969, Sylvia Siegel was
back into the fray of advocacy.
At
that time
Pacific Telephone
(PacTel) was applying to the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
for the right to increase
its telephone
rates. Siegel,
feeling that the rate hikes were unjustified, called the
media and
began efforts to block
the rate
increase. Seeing
that other public-serving
industries were also regulated by the CPUC, Siegel researched the role and
the language of the CPUC.
She found out "Who was who; who were the 'good guys' and
who were
the 'bad
guys'." She attended CPUC
hearings and
asked questions
of the witnesses speaking in favor of rate hikes. One
CPUC commissioner, was heard
to ask "Who is this broad?;" He
would soon find out.
She
once attended a
hearing on the moving industry and listened to the reasoning behind their
request for rate hikes. She
asked questions and picked apart the survey that
they were citing as evidence the hikes were needed.
She found that the survey was ten years old, that three of the ten
companies surveyed were out of
business and that
other "facts" were
just plain false. The people
in the hearing room were stunned by her ability
to cut to the essence of the matter.
Siegel's
ability to
interpret complicated data and communicate the findings
into the
"everyday language
that consumers can
understand" was
an important tool
for the California consumer movement. When
the Association of California
Consumers decided to move its offices to Sacramento, Siegel decided not
to continue as Executive Director, instead,
she drove to the
state capitol when she could (often
using grocery money for gas expenses) and attended hearings of importance
to her. "I
knew I was hooked," she
laughs.
By
this time,
the new California governor,
Ronald Reagan, was attempting to change the nature of the CPUC
through appointments to the Commission. Favoring industry,
new CPUC acted in ways
detrimental to the California consumer. (Reagan
also fired Helen Nelson, in an attempt to eliminate the position of consumer
advocacy from
his administration.)
In January of 1973, she
founded the consumer organization,
T.U.R.N., which
stands for Toward Utility
Rate Normalization.
She founded TURN with the idea of "turning" back
the PUC to serve
the public's interest, the original mission of the PUC.
The business of regulated rate-setting is "complicated and
tedious". It is
tiresome work, and utility companies
pay highly-skilled
staff to
work the complicated system
in support of ever-higher
rates. Against these
giant utility
companies with their
staffers came Sylvia Siegel.
For
three years, TURN was a one-woman operation.
Then Siegel got a small grant of $1500 and enlisted the volunteer help of
a Ph.d. economist. Together they began
to unravel the
maze of utility industry statistics,
developing "wonderful testimony"
which led to a landmark rate reform decision.
The impact was nation-wide.
Basically, it
led to
the utility industry changing their rate structures
which eliminated
a discount
for increased usage-rather
it supported reduced
use. It also mandated
a "lifeline rate" - a minimum amount of
gas and electric made
available at reasonable rates for
those who needed
it most - the segment of the population on
fixed incomes,
benefiting the
elderly and others. This was
the first major impact of TURN.
They
finally got another small grant
which enabled Siegel to pay the economist a
small salary.
They continued
to translate puzzling utility
documents into
plain, everyday language. If
they didn't know something, they would do
additional research. They kept at the heels of the utility industry,
staying involved in the "juicy" issues.
"If you can't be juicy, no one's going to listen to you."
They fed their findings to the news media.
"It would drive the
utilities nuts. They would say I
was flamboyant or that I was exaggerating, but that's not
so. I just
made it understandable and juicy
so that people would
listen." Siegel was once the
subject of a 1984
CBS "Sixty
Minutes" segment, entitled "Don't Mess With Sylvia".
What most
people don't realize is
that utilities can go in ten times a year to the PUC to request a rate
increase. So the vigil of Siegel
and TURN was constant. Many of TURN'S successes came in small victories far
from the
public's eye.
And, not all attempts
to protect "the little guys" resulted in stopping rate hikes.
But, Siegel figures, "...over the years
- we stopped to figure it
out a
couple of
years ago
- we
have saved the California consumer over seven billion dollars."
In hers years at TURN,
Siegel led the battles against the rate hikes of Pacific Bell ("they go for
rate increase every year and it's a
new story every time!"), PG&E
and its
Diablo Canyon
costs. Southern California
Gas, and GTE to name
a few. TURN
has led petition drives in addition to its research/evidence gathering
activities.
Also, they
often had to go use the legal system for some matters, a costly strategy.
Luckily, Siegel was successful in
attracting large law firms to help
TURN on a pro-bono (free) basis. "We've
had superb appellate council from Morrision
and Forrester and so on.
We even went to
the Supreme Court on one case."
She even went to law school four nights/week
for one year, but
found it a better use of her
time to focus on leading TURN and relying on the legal
expertise of
others. Using
CETA grants, TURN developed
a program of training lawyers in
utility law, as no western law
schools even covered the
subject. This
program lasted for five years until
the CETA program was cancelled. Some of the lawyers stayed on and worked for
TURN, though the pay was never high-they
did it for their commitment to the public welfare.
During the
Ford administration, Siegel obtained a
$150,000 grant from the Department
of Energy to set up
a school for consumer advocates in the
twelve western
states, to
educate them in utility issues. She
recruited instructors
from around the country and
set up a series
of seminars.
She established a hotline to
give advice to the consumer advocates after completing the seminars in case they
ran into difficulties. The
grant was renewed under the
Carter Administration.
However, following his anti-consumer
policies as
governor. President
Ronald Reagan killed the school program upon entering office, as well as other
consumer programs. But, Siegel
continued her efforts in utility
rate fairness. “If I weren’t an
optimist, I’d never be able to continue.
You don’t always win, you frequently lose.
You just can’t sit back, you have to go on.
Other things need your attention.”
Finally,
after sixteen years with TURN and reaching the age of 71, Siegel decided to
retire as Executive Director, though she remains on its Board of Directors.
She left the organization she founded with sixteen paid staff in place,
including three full-time lawyers and a projected operating budget of almost a
half-million dollars. In 1989,
there was a “retirement roast” for her and over 350 people attended.
Many people from the utility industry came.
“I think they wanted to make sure I was leaving.” Siegel jokes.
But
then came the cable television controversy, and Sylvia Siegel is at it again,
though not on a full-time basis. “Cable
is a monopoly. Without competition
and regulation it can raise rates at will in spite of bad service.”
Bringing her tenacious style to the investigation of cable, Siegel knows
that she will have to be a “quick study” to understand the industry.
Quoted in the Marin Independent Journal, Dennis Mangers (the lobbyist for
the California Cable Television Association) stated, “Sylvia had been
effective in the past. I consider her a pretty effective adversary.”
By the summer of 1991, Marin County Supervisor Bob Roumiguiere sought to
have her removed, objecting to her hard-fisted style, particularly her sharp
criticism of Marin’ Viacom Cablevision. Siegel
had criticized Viacom for refusing to divulge how much profit the company earned
from its 61,000 Marin subscribers.
Siegel
recently testified on the cable regulation issue both in the United States
Congress and in the California State Legislature.
In addition, she pushed for re-regulation while appearing on a
nation-wide radio talk show. The
story of the future of the cable industry continues to unfold, with Sylvia
Siegel actively involved. Stay
tuned for further news…
|